Against Superkitten Ethics

Abstract

I here criticize the use of science-fiction examples in ethics, chiefly, though not solely, by defenders of abortion. We have no reliable intuitions concerning such examples—certainly nothing strong enough to set against the strong intuition that infanticide is virtually always wrong.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
6 (#1,142,643)

6 months
1 (#386,040)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Against Superkitten Ethics.Philip E. Devine - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (4):429-436.
The Moral Significance of Spontaneous Abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.
Future Present: Ethics and/as Science Fiction.Pinsky Pinsky - 2003 - Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Does Virtue Ethics Really Exclude Duty Ethics?Piotr Szalek - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):351-361.
Reproductive Autonomy and the Ethics of Abortion.Barbara Hewson - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 2):10-14.
Does Virtue Ethics Really Exclude Duty Ethics?Robert Piercey - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):351-361.
The Virtues of Belief: Toward a Non-Evidentialist Ethics of Belief-Formation.Richard Amesbury - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1-3):25 - 37.
Abortion, Contraception, Infanticide.Philip E. Devine - 1983 - Philosophy 58 (226):513 - 520.