Characterizing Motherese: On the Computational Structure of Child-Directed Language
Abstract
We report a quantitative analysis of the cross-utterance coordination observed in child-directed language, where successive utterances often overlap in a manner that makes their constituent structure more prominent, and describe the application of a recently published unsupervised algorithm for grammar induction to the largest available corpus of such language, producing a grammar capable of accepting and generating novel wellformed sentences. We also introduce a new corpus-based method for assessing the precision and recall of an automatically acquired generative grammar without recourse to human judgment. The present work sets the stage for the eventual development of more powerful unsupervised algorithms for language acquisition, which would make use of the coordination structures present in natural child-directed speech.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Natural language grammar induction using a constituent-context model.Christopher Manning - manuscript
Which came first: Infants learning language or motherese?Heather Bortfeld - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):505-506.
Natural Language Grammar Induction using a Constituent-Context Model.Dan Klein & Christopher D. Manning - unknown
Finitely constrained classes of homogeneous directed graphs.Brenda J. Latka - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1):124-139.
A Probabilistic Computational Model of Cross-Situational Word Learning.Afsaneh Fazly, Afra Alishahi & Suzanne Stevenson - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (6):1017-1063.
Concepts, structures, and meanings.Grant R. Gillett - 1987 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (March):101-112.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-12-22
Downloads
42 (#280,645)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
2010-12-22
Downloads
42 (#280,645)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):429-448.
Recipient design in tacit communication.Sarah E. Newman-Norlund, Matthijs L. Noordzij, Roger D. Newman-Norlund, Inge A. C. Volman, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Peter Hagoort & Ivan Toni - 2009 - Cognition 111 (1):46-54.
With diversity in mind: freeing the language sciences from Universal Grammar.Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):472-492.
Commentary/Evans & Levinson: The myth of language universals.Derek C. Penn, Keith J. Holyoak & Daniel J. Povinellia - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5).
References found in this work
Mother, Id rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style.E. Newport, Henry Gleitman & L. Gleitman - 1977 - In Catherine E. Snow & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), Talking to Children. Cambridge University Press. pp. 109--149.