In Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. pp. 768--793 (2006)
The logical constants are technical terms, invented and precisely defined by logicians for the purpose of producing rigorous formal proofs. Mathematics virtually exhausts the domain of deductive reasoning of any complexity, and it is there that the benefits of this refined form of language are felt. Pragmatic issues may arise — issues concerning the point of making a certain statement — for there will be more or less perspicuous and illuminating ways of presenting proofs in this language, and we may be puzzled or misled when we wonder why the mathematician is taking some particular step. But this is hardly a compulsory topic in the philosophy of language.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Problem of Logical Constants.Mario Gomez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Understanding the Logical Constants and Dispositions.Corine Besson - 2009 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 5 (1):1-24.
New Intuitionistic Logical Constants and Novikov Completeness.Alexander Yashin - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (2):151-180.
A Characterization of Logical Constants is Possible.Gila Sher - 2003 - Theoria 18 (2):189-198.
Implicational Paradoxes and the Meaning of Logical Constants.Francesco Paoli - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):553 – 579.
The 'Must' and the 'Heptahedron': Remarks on Remarks.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2003 - Theoria 18 (2):199-206.
Added to index2010-10-25
Total downloads6 ( #555,722 of 2,164,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,462 of 2,164,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?