From relative confirmation to real confirmation

Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Recent work on the logical theory of confirmation has centered on accounts of the confirmation of hypotheses relative to auxiliary assumptions or background theory. Whether such relative confirmation actually increases the credibility of the (relatively) confirmed hypothesis will depend in various ways on the epistemic status of the auxiliaries involved. Most obviously, if the auxiliaries are not themselves credible, confirmation relative to them will not increase the credibility of the hypothesis thus confirmed. A complete theory of confirmation must thus combine an account of relative confirmation with an account of the route from relative confirmation to real confirmation. Some recent criticisms of hypothetico-deductive and bootstrapping accounts of relative confirmation are undermined by failure to appreciate the limitations of relative confirmation



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Belief and the Incremental Confirmation of One Hypothesis Relative to Another.Andre Mirabelli - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:287 - 301.
What Is the Point of Confirmation?Franz Huber - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1146-1159.
Confirmation of scientific hypotheses as relations.Aysel Dogan - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):243 - 259.
Choosing between confirmation theories.R. G. Swinburne - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (4):602-613.
Glymour on confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):292-307.
Confirmation theory.James Hawthorne - 2011 - In Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Malcolm Forster (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7: Philosophy of Statistics. Elsevier.
Subjective and objective confirmation.Patrick Maher - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (2):149-174.


Added to PP

55 (#284,290)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aron Edidin
New College of Florida

Citations of this work

The irrelevance of bootstrapping.David Christensen - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):644-662.
Toward a defensible bootstrapping.Sam Mitchell - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (2):241-260.
Bootstrapping and Content Parts.Ken Gemes - 2006 - Erkenntnis 64 (3):345-370.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy of Natural Science.Carl G. Hempel - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):70-72.
Glymour on evidential relevance.David Christensen - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):471-481.
Hypothetico-deductivism is hopeless.Clark Glymour - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):322-325.
Revisions of bootstrap testing.Clark Glymour - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):626-629.
Glymour on confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):292-307.

Add more references