American Journal of Bioethics 18 (10):35-42 (2018)

Authors
Abstract
As the usual regulatory framework did not fit well during the last Ebola outbreak, innovative thinking still needed. In the absence of an outbreak, randomised controlled trials of clinical efficacy in humans cannot be done, while during an outbreak such trials will continue to face significant practical, philosophical, and ethical challenges. This article argues that researchers should also test the safety and effectiveness of novel vaccines in wild apes by employing a pluralistic approach to evidence. There are three reasons to test vaccines in wild populations of apes: i) protect apes; ii) reduce Ebola transmission from wild animals to humans; and iii) accelerate vaccine development and licensing for humans. Data obtained from studies of vaccines among wild apes and chimpanzees may even be considered sufficient for licensing new vaccines for humans. This strategy will serve to benefit both wild apes and humans.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2018.1513584
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,118
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Selecting the Right Tool For the Job.Arthur L. Caplan, Carolyn Plunkett & Bruce Levin - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (4):4-10.
The Ebola clinical trials: a precedent for research ethics in disasters.P. Calain - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (1):3-8.
One Health, Vaccines and Ebola: The Opportunities for Shared Benefits.Benjamin Capps & Zohar Lederman - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (6):1011-1032.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

More Risky Than Radical.Lori Gruen - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (10):45-47.
Instilling Fairness in Animal Research.Bernard E. Rollin - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (10):43-45.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

One Health, Vaccines and Ebola: The Opportunities for Shared Benefits.Benjamin Capps & Zohar Lederman - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (6):1011-1032.
Responding to a Public Health Objection to Vaccinating the Great Apes.Benjamin Capps & Zohar Lederman - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (5):883-895.
Joint Attention in Apes and Humans: Are Humans Unique?David Leavens & Timothy Racine - 2009 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (6-8):240-267.
Live Free or Die. [REVIEW]Joel Marks - 2010 - Animal Law 17 (1):243-250.
Imitation and Cultural Transmission in Apes and Cetaceans.Andrew Whiten - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):359-360.
Being Humans When We Are Animals.Pär Segerdahl - 2014 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 3 (2):125-149.
Making Wildlife Viewable: Habituation and Attraction.John Knight - 2009 - Society and Animals 17 (2):167-184.
The Moral Relevance of the Distinction Between Domesticated and Wild Animals.Clare Palmer - 2011 - In Tom Beauchamp & R. G. Frey (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 701-725.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-10-21

Total views
17 ( #554,399 of 2,324,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #682,670 of 2,324,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes