Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):181-200 (1985)

Rem B. Edwards
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Modern bioethics is clearly dominated by deontologists who believe that we have some way of identifying morally correct and incorrect acts or rules besides taking account of their consequences. Robert M. Veatch is one of the most outspoken of those numerous modern medical ethicists who agree in rejecting all forms of teleological, utilitarian, or consequentialist ethical theories. This paper examines his critique of utilitarianism and shows that the utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill is either not touched at all by his critique or can be defended against it. This article argues that the dominant deontological majority is mistaken and that a utilitarian theory of moral action very much like Mill’s is precisely what is needed by modern medical ethics and by those medical practitioners who are resolved to practice medicine in a reasonable and morally acceptable manner.
Keywords Medical Ethics  Critiques of Utilitrianism  Deontology and Medical Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0038-4283
DOI southernjphil198523216
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mill’s Moral Standard.Ben Eggleston - 2017 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 358-373.
Mill's Utilitarianism: Exposition and Evaluation.Golam Azam - 2005 - Philosophy and Progress 37:137.
Utilitarianism.John Stuart Mill - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
J. S. Mill's Revisionist Utilitarianism.Don Habibi - 1998 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (1):89 – 114.
Utilitarianism.Colin Heydt (ed.) - 2010 - Broadview Press.
Three Utilitarians: Hume, Bentham, and Mill.Yusuke Kaneko - 2013 - IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion and Philosophy 1 (1):65-78.
Mill's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays.David Lyons (ed.) - 1997 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Two Concepts of Rule Utilitarianism.Rex Martin - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (2):227-255.


Added to PP index

Total views
422 ( #22,586 of 2,498,540 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
102 ( #6,894 of 2,498,540 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes