Advances in Bioethics 2:303 (1997)

Authors
Rem B. Edwards
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Abstract
This article tries to show that commonplace economic, ethico-religious, anti-racist,and logical-consistency objections to public funding of abortions and abortion counseling for poor women are quite weak. By contrast, arguments appealing to basic human rights to freedom of speech, informed consent, protection from great harm, justice and equal protection under the law, strongly support public funding. Thus, refusing to provide abortions at public expense for women who cannot afford them is morally unacceptable and rationally unjustifiable, despite the opinions of former Presidents Reagan and Bush, the more conservative members of the Supreme Court of the United States, the current Congress, and the majority of the American people.
Keywords Abortion  Abortion funding
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Recent and Possible Future Trends in Abortion.F. Lafitte - 1978 - Journal of Medical Ethics 4 (1):25-29.
Estimating the Number of Illegal Abortions.Colin Francome - 1977 - Journal of Biosocial Science 9 (4):467-479.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-24

Total views
81 ( #125,291 of 2,420,817 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #192,268 of 2,420,817 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes