Situating 'Giving Voice to Values': A Metatheoretical Evaluation of a New Approach to Business Ethics

Journal of Business Ethics 121 (3):1-19 (2014)

Authors
Nin Kirkham
University of Western Australia
Abstract
The evaluation of new theories and pedagogical approaches to business ethics is an essential task for ethicists. This is true not only for empirical and applied evaluation but also for metatheoretical evaluation. However, while there is increasing interest in the practical utility and empirical testing of ethical theories, there has been little systematic evaluation of how new theories relate to existing ones or what novel conceptual characteristics they might contribute. This paper aims to address this lack by discussing the role of metatheorising in assessing new approaches to ethics. The approach is illustrated through evaluating a new pedagogy and curriculum for ethics education called Giving Voice to Values (GVV). Our method involves identifying a number of metatheoretical lenses from existing reviews of ethical theories and applying these to examine GVV’s conceptual elements. Although GVV has been explicitly presented as a pedagogy and teaching curriculum, we argue that it has the potential to contribute significantly to the development of ethical theory. We discuss the general implications of this metatheoretical method of evaluation for new approaches to business ethics and for GVV and its future development
Keywords Metatheoretical evaluation  Metatheory building  Giving Voice to Values  Performative ethics  Communicative ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1738-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,736
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 60 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Assessment of Individual Moral Goodness.B. Chiu Raymond & D. Hackett Rick - 2017 - Business Ethics: A European Review 26 (1):31-46.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

10.5840/Jbee20118125.Špela Trefalt - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):326-331.
10.5840/Jbee20118130.Cynthia Ingols - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):358-364.
10.5840/Jbee20118127.Kathleen E. McKone-Sweet, Danna Greenberg & H. James Wilson - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):337-342.
10.5840/Jbee20118128.Daniel G. Arce - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):343-347.
10.5840/Jbee20118121.Mary C. Gentile - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):305-307.
Business ETHICS/BUSINESS Ethics: One Field or Two?Gary R. Weaver - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (2):113-128.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-12

Total views
32 ( #253,364 of 2,243,790 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #400,169 of 2,243,790 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature