Unfreedom as development? Innate differences and the wealth of nations

Abstract

I remark on the explanation that innate differences account for why some countries are wealthy and others poor. I draw a distinction between two versions of this explanation.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

How to build a baby: A new toolkit?Diane Poulin-Dubois - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):144-145.
Innate ideas.Paul M. Pietroski & Stephen Crain - 2005 - In James A. McGilvray (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 164--181.
How equality matters.Hillel Steiner - 2002 - Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (1):342-356.
Adam Smith on labour and capital.Tony Aspromouroos - 2013 - In Christopher J. Berry, Maria Pia Paganelli & Craig Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Adam Smith. Oxford University Press.
On Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations : A Philosophical Companion (review).David R. Raynor - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (3):365-366.
Précis of the origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):113-124.
Innate Ideas.Stephen P. Stich (ed.) - 1975 - Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
Does collective unfreedom matter? Individualism, power and proletarian unfreedom.Andreas T. Schmidt - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (6):964-985.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-05

Downloads
135 (#131,586)

6 months
55 (#74,670)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references