Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: a coherentist approach

Synthese 191 (13):3111-3141 (2014)

Authors
Dunja Šešelja
Eindhoven University of Technology
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to offer an account of epistemic justification suitable for the context of theory pursuit, that is, for the context in which new scientific ideas, possibly incompatible with the already established theories, emerge and are pursued by scientists. We will frame our account paradigmatically on the basis of one of the influential systems of epistemic justification: Laurence Bonjour’s coherence theory of justification. The idea underlying our approach is to develop a set of criteria which indicate that the pursued system is promising of contributing to the epistemic goal of robustness of scientific knowledge and of developing into a candidate for acceptance. In order to realize this we will (a) adjust the scope of Bonjour’s standards—consistency, inferential density, and explanatory power, and (b) complement them by the requirement of a programmatic character. In this way we allow for the evaluation of the “potential coherence” of the given epistemic system
Keywords Epistemic justification  Coherence  Bonjour  Inconsistency  Explanatory power  Pursuit worthiness  Robustness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-014-0476-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,128
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather E. Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Science, Truth, and Democracy.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - Oxford University Press.

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rational Endorsement.Will Fleisher - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (10):2649-2675.
How to Endorse Conciliationism.Will Fleisher - forthcoming - Synthese:1-27.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-25

Total views
97 ( #92,687 of 2,311,514 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #103,475 of 2,311,514 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature