Topoi 32 (1):9-19 (2013)

Authors
Dunja Šešelja
Eindhoven University of Technology
Christian Straßer
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Abstract
The aim of this paper is, on the one hand, to critically investigate Kuhn’s stance on the assessment of the pursuit worthiness of scientific theories, and, on the other hand, to show the actuality of some of Kuhn’s points on this issue, in view of their critical analysis. To this end we show that Kuhn presents certain tools, which may help scientists to overcome communication breakdowns when engaging in the process of rational deliberation regarding the question whether a theory is worthy of further pursuit. These tools are persuasion, translation and interpretation. However, we argue that the perspective of epistemic semantic monism present in Kuhn’s work obstructs the full applicability of these tools. We show that dropping this perspective makes the notions of persuasion and interpretation more fruitful, and moreover, allows for a pluralism of scientific theories and practices that complements the pluralism based on disagreement among scientists, emphasized by Kuhn.
Keywords Thomas Kuhn  Pursuit worthiness  Theory choice  Epistemic monism  Methodological pluralism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11245-012-9144-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,775
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rational Endorsement.Will Fleisher - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (10):2649-2675.
How to Endorse Conciliationism.Will Fleisher - forthcoming - Synthese:1-27.
Of Water Drops and Atomic Nuclei: Analogies and Pursuit Worthiness in Science.Rune Nyrup - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (3):881-903.
Kuhn on Incommensurability and Theory Choice.Alex Davies - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):571-579.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Spell of Kuhn on Psychology: An Exegetical Elixir.William O'Donohue - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (3):267 – 287.
Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Darwin, Kuhn, and Polanyi.Richard Henry Schmitt - 2006 - Tradition and Discovery 33 (2):49-55.
Did Tom Kuhn Actually Meet Tom Bayes?Lefteris Farmakis - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (1):41 - 53.
Thomas Kuhn's Irrationalism.James Franklin - 2000 - New Criterion 18 (10):29-34.
Paul Feyerabend Und Thomas Kuhn.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):61-83.
Kuhn’s Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense.Gerald Doppelt - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):33 – 86.
Kuhnian Puzzle Solving and Schema Theory.Thomas Nickles - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):255.
Kuhn, Nominalism, and Empiricism.Alexander Bird - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):690-719.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-11-04

Total views
165 ( #60,957 of 2,432,662 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #138,335 of 2,432,662 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes