Quentin Smith on infinity and the past

Philosophy of Science 55 (3):453-455 (1988)
Abstract
In a recent commendable article, Quentin Smith (1987) exposes fatal flaws in several recent attempts to demonstrate that it is logically impossible for the past to be infinite. However, his analysis of one of these flawed arguments--involving an interesting version of Russell's "Tristram Shandy paradox"--is off the mark, as I show in this paper
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289451
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,751
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Logical Structure of the Debate About McTaggart's Paradox.Quentin Smith - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:371-379.
The Infinite Regress of Temporal Attributions.Quentin Smith - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):383-396.
Divine Causation.Richard T. McClelland & Robert J. Deltete - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):3-25.
Rewriting the Past: Retrospective Description and its Consequences.Adrian Haddock - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):3-24.
Internal and External Causal Explanations of the Universe.Quentin Smith - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 79 (3):283 - 310.
Infinity and the Past.Quentin Smith - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):63-75.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

18 ( #261,079 of 2,146,888 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #279,062 of 2,146,888 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums