Philosophy of Science 55 (3):453-455 (1988)
In a recent commendable article, Quentin Smith (1987) exposes fatal flaws in several recent attempts to demonstrate that it is logically impossible for the past to be infinite. However, his analysis of one of these flawed arguments--involving an interesting version of Russell's "Tristram Shandy paradox"--is off the mark, as I show in this paper
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Logical Structure of the Debate About McTaggart's Paradox.Quentin Smith - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:371-379.
The Infinite Regress of Temporal Attributions.Quentin Smith - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):383-396.
Divine Causation.Richard T. McClelland & Robert J. Deltete - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):3-25.
Rewriting the Past: Retrospective Description and its Consequences.Adrian Haddock - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):3-24.
Internal and External Causal Explanations of the Universe.Quentin Smith - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 79 (3):283 - 310.
On the Argument From Quantum Cosmology Against Theism.Ned Markosian - 1995 - Analysis 55 (4):247 - 251.
Quantum Cosmology and the Beginning of the Universe.Gerrit Smith & Robert Weingard - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):663-667.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #261,079 of 2,146,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,062 of 2,146,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.