Undermining Motivations for Universalism

Noûs 45 (4):696-713 (2011)
Abstract
Universalism (the thesis that for any ys, those ys compose a further object) is an answer to the Special Composition Question. In the literature there are three arguments – what I call the arguments from elegance – that universalists often rely upon, but which are rarely examined in-depth. I argue that these motivations cannot be had by the perdurantist, for to avoid a commitment to badly behaved superluminal objects perdurantists must answer the ‘Proper Continuant Question’. Any answer to that question necessarily ensures that there is a restricted answer to the Special Composition Question that is just as elegant as universalism. Thus, if you are a perdurantist, the arguments from elegance fail to motivate universalism for there will always be a restricted composition that is just as good
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00779.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,157
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Material Beings.Peter van Inwagen - 1990 - Cornell University Press.
Objects and Persons.Trenton Merricks - 2001 - Oxford University Press.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Restricted Diachronic Composition and Special Relativity.S. Torre - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):235-255.
Ordinary Objects.Daniel Z. Korman - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Universalism and Classes.Nikk Effingham - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (3):451-472.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Universalism and Classes.Nikk Effingham - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (3):451-472.
Composition as Identity Doesn't Settle the Special Composition Question.Ross P. Cameron - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):531-554.
Restricted Composition.Ned Markosian - 2008 - In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 341--63.
Unrestricted Composition and Restricted Quantification.Daniel Z. Korman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):319-334.
In Defense of Naïve Universalism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Faith and Philosophy 20 (3):345-363.
In Defense of Mereological Universalism.Michael C. Rea - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):347-360.
Conceptual Conservatism and Contingent Composition.Josh Parsons - 2013 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (4):327-339.
The Contingency of Composition.Ross P. Cameron - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (1):99-121.
Composition as a Secondary Quality.Uriah Kriegel - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):359-383.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-22

Total downloads

57 ( #92,457 of 2,171,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,615 of 2,171,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums