Lévinas and Ricoeur on the Possibility of God after the End of Theodicy

Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):23-48 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay examines Lévinas and Ricoeur’s criticisms of the project of theodicy and analyzes their attempts to figure an approach to God that survives the end of theodicy in terms of ethics (Lévinas) or hope (Ricoeur). In conclusion, it is argued that while both thinkers engage in the important task of disassociating God from the justificatory practices of theodicy, Ricoeur’s hope in the God of the future offers more ample resources for theological appropriation than Lévinas’s approach to God within the limits of ethics alone

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logical and Metaphysical Assumptions of Bernard Bolzano's Theodicy.Dariusz Łukasiewicz - 2007 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 12 (1):33 - 56.
Returning to God After God: Levinas, Derrida, Ricoeur.Richard Kearney - 2009 - Research in Phenomenology 39 (2):167-183.
Murdoch and Levinas on God and Good.Fiona Ellis - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):63 - 87.
Does Theism Need a Theodicy?Richard Swinburne - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):287 - 311.
Theodicy, Our Well-Being, and God's Rights.Richard Swinburne - 1995 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38 (1-3):75 - 91.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
58 (#201,708)

6 months
1 (#415,205)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Overcoming the Limits of Theodicy: An Interactive Reciprocal Response to Evil.John Culp - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (3):263-276.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references