Philosophy of Science 29 (4):369-376 (1962)
AbstractThis paper represents an attempt to analyze the basis for the lack of interest and study in the sociology of science within American sociology and within American society. An attempt is first made to indicate the divergence between the meta-sociology of the sociologist of knowledge and contemporary American sociology; and in a derivative manner to indicate the way in which divergent meta-sociologies may lead to different claims about the relationship of science and society. Secondly, an attempt is made to show how the prestige position of the sociologist and the clarity of his status with regard to natural science may also be construed as grounds for the neglect of this field of inquiry
Similar books and articles
Knowledge as Culture: The New Sociology of Knowledge.E. Doyle McCarthy - 1996 - Routledge.
Establishment sociology: The value of being value-free.Irving Louis Horowitz - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):129 – 140.
Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science.Craig Calhoun (ed.) - 2010 - Columbia University Press.
The Uncertain Science: Criticism of Sociological Formalism.Ahmed Gurnah - 1992 - Routledge.
The sociology of knowledge and its enemies.Bernard Susser - 1989 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (3):245 – 260.
But is it sociology of knowledge? Wilhelm Jerusalem’s “sociology of cognition” in context.Thomas Uebel - 2012 - Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):5-37.
Levels of Reflexivity: Unnoted Differences within the "Strong Programme" in the Sociology of Knowledge.Edward Manier - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:197-207.
Sociology as Public Discourse and Professional Practice: A Critique of Michael Burawoy.John Holmwood - 2007 - Sociological Theory 25 (1):46-66.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads