Perspectives on Science 28 (4):459-481 (2020)

Authors
Jaana Eigi
University of Tartu
Abstract
The approach to expert communities and political representation of non-experts in Harry Collins and Robert Evans’ elective modernism reflects the conviction that experts are not representative of ordinary citizens. I use an analysis of aspects of representation and the argument from inductive risk to argue that experts can be seen as representative of non-experts, when we understand representation as resemblance based on shared social perspectives and acknowledge the inevitable involvement of such perspectives in decisions under inductive risk. This, in turn, has implications for some of the proposals about practices and institutions made in elective modernism.
Keywords expertise  inductive risk  elective modernism  representation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc_a_00347
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,194
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Inductive Risk and Values in Science.Heather Douglas - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (4):559-579.
Bias and Values in Scientific Research.Torsten Wilholt - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):92-101.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Elective Modernism and the Politics of (Bio) Ethical Expertise.Nathan Emmerich - 2018 - In Hauke Riesch, Nathan Emmerich & Steven Wainwright (eds.), Philosophies and Sociologies of Bioethics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: pp. 23-40.
In Favor of Meritocracy, Not Against Democracy.Ricardo Tavares Da Silva - 2017 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 7 (1).
Are There Moral Experts?Robert W. Burch - 1974 - The Monist 58 (4):646-658.
Lay Expertise: Why Involve the Public in Biobank Governance?Bjørn Myskja - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (1):1-16.
Have the Experts Been Weighed, Measured, and Found Wanting?Bryan Caplan - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):81-91.
Experts: What Are They and How Can Laypeople Identify Them?Thomas Grundmann - forthcoming - In Jennifer Lackey & Aidan McGlynn (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Politics and Expertise.John Wilson - 1971 - Philosophy 46 (175):34 - 37.
When Expert Disagreement Supports the Consensus.Finnur Dellsén - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1):142-156.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-31

Total views
30 ( #363,154 of 2,448,336 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #98,471 of 2,448,336 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes