Different motivations, similar proposals: objectivity in scientific community and democratic science policy

Synthese 194 (12):4657-4669 (2017)

Authors
Jaana Eigi
University of Tartu
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to discuss some possible connections between philosophical proposals about the social organisation of science and developments towards a greater democratisation of science policy. I suggest that there are important similarities between one approach to objectivity in philosophy of science—Helen Longino’s account of objectivity as freedom from individual biases achieved through interaction of a variety of perspectives—and some ideas about the epistemic benefits of wider representation of various groups’ perspectives in science policy, as analysed by Mark Brown. Given these similarities, I suggest that they allow one to approach developments in science policy as if one of their aims were epistemic improvement that can be recommended on the basis of the philosophical account; analyses of political developments inspired by these ideas about the benefits of inclusive dialogue can then be used for understanding the possibility to implement a philosophical proposal for improving the objectivity of science in practice. Outlining this suggestion, I also discuss the possibility of important differences between the developments in the two spheres and show how the concern about the possible divergence of politically motivated and epistemically motivated changes may be mitigated. In order to substantiate further the suggestion I make, I discuss one example of a development where politically motivated and epistemically motivated changes converge in practice—the development of professional ethics in American archaeology as analysed by Alison Wylie. I suggest that analysing such specific developments and getting involved with them can be one of the tasks for philosophy of science. In the concluding part of the paper I discuss how this approach to philosophy of science is related to a number of arguments about a more politically relevant philosophy of science.
Keywords Objectivity  Science policy  Socially relevant philosophy of science  Democratic representation  Helen Longino  Mark Brown  Alison Wylie
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1077-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Fate of Knowledge.Helen Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
Science, Truth, and Democracy.Philip Kitcher - 2003 - Mind 112 (448):746-749.
Science in a Democratic Society.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101:95-112.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Scientists Be Objective?Malcolm Williams - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (2):163 – 180.
Science as Social Knowledge.Helen Longino - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):283-285.
Objectivity in Science.Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.) - 2015 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 310. Springer.
On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle.Jaana Eigi - 2015 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 30 (3):449-463.
A Plurality of Pluralisms: Collaborative Practice in Archaeology.Alison Wylie - 2015 - In Jonathan Y. Tsou, Alan Richardson & Flavia Padovani (eds.), Objectivity in Science. Springer Verlag. pp. 189-210.
Scientific Objectivity and the Logics of Science.H. E. Longino - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):85 – 106.
Social Objectivity Under Scrutiny in the Pasteur–Pouchet Debate.José Antonio López Cerezo - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (2):301-318.
What Should Be the Data Sharing Policy of Cognitive Science?Mark A. Pitt & Yun Tang - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):214-221.
Objectivity in the Feminist Philosophy of Science.Karen Cordrick Haely - 2003 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
IV. Longino and Heidegger on Objectivity.Philip Lewin - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):145-148.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-04-07

Total views
48 ( #165,625 of 2,250,039 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #44,122 of 2,250,039 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature