Authors
Kristian Ekeli
University Of Stavanger
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to consider the following question: To what extent is it permissible for a liberal democratic state to suppress the spread of illiberal ideas (including anti-democratic ideas)? I will discuss two approaches to this question. The first can be termed the clear and imminent danger approach, and the second the preventive approach. The clear and imminent danger approach implies that it is permissible for liberal states to suppress the spread of illiberal doctrines and ideas only if they pose a clear and imminent danger to security and/or the stability of liberal democratic institutions. The preventive approach, which is the one that I will propose and defend, goes further than this: it implies that it can also be permissible for a liberal state to restrict the spread of illiberal doctrines and ideas in order to prevent certain extremist illiberal groups (which I will term offensive illiberal groups) from gaining increased popular and political support, and in order to prevent such groups from becoming significant and powerful political actors. However, the evaluation and choice of liberty-limiting suppressive measures should be guided and restricted by two principles or side-constraints: the significance principle and the least restrictive means principle.
Keywords free speech   illiberal groups and ideas   liberalism   political extremism   tolerance
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2012.661581
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - Duckworth.
On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 1859 - Broadview Press.
Harm to Others.Joel Feinberg - 1987 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Same-Sex Marriage and the Charge of Illiberality.Peter Brian Barry - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (2):333-357.
Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?Kaija Rossi - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:165-170.
Can Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach Be a Foundation of Politically Liberal Theory of Justice?Yuko Kamishima - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:293-298.
Liberal Autonomy.Loren E. Lomasky - 1990 - Philosophy and Theology 4 (3):297-309.
South Africa and the Prospect of Political Liberalism.Stephen De Wijze - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (3):48-80.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-19

Total views
36 ( #313,409 of 2,498,167 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #140,331 of 2,498,167 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes