Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):12–23 (2006)
I go through, and criticize, Stephen Schiffer's account of vagueness and the sorites paradox. I discuss his notion of a happy-face solution to a paradox, his appeal to vagueness-related partial belief, his claim that indeterminacy is a psychological notion, and his view that the sorites premise and the inference rule of modus ponens are indeterminate.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
On Being in a Quandary. Relativism Vagueness Logical Revisionism.C. J. G. Wright - 2001 - Mind 110 (437):45--97.
The Epistemic Conception of Vagueness.Crispin Wright - 1995 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 33 (S1):133-160.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Sorites is No Threat to Modus Ponens: A Reply to Kochan.Colin Howson - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):209-212.
Deconstructing Ontological Vagueness.Matti Eklund - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):117-140.
Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox.Richard DeWitt - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
Unwrinkling the Carpet of Meaning: Stephen Schiffer, the Things We Mean.A. Max Jarvie - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (1):85-99.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #124,035 of 2,171,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,902 of 2,171,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?