Demonstratives as individual concepts

Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (4):409-466 (2008)
Abstract
Using a version of situation semantics, this article argues that bare and complex demonstratives are interpreted as individual concepts.
Keywords Demonstratives  Individual concepts  Pronouns  Situation semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10988-008-9043-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Ontological Relativity and Other Essays.W. V. Quine - 1969 - Columbia University Press.
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press, Usa.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Logic for Languages Containing Referentially Promiscuous Expressions.Geoff Georgi - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (4):429-451.
Names in Strange Places.Aidan Gray - 2017 - Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (5):429-472.
The Existence Entailments of Definite Descriptions.Paul Elbourne - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (1):1-10.
Why Propositions Might Be Sets of Truth-Supporting Circumstances.Paul Elbourne - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (1):101-111.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
135 ( #38,698 of 2,210,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #80,629 of 2,210,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature