Journal of Moral Philosophy:1-26 (forthcoming)

Gideon Elford
Oxford University
One of the most powerful arguments against state regulation of expression has, in recent years, been presented in a reinvigorated and developed form. The argument in question maintains that state regulation of expression undercuts the legitimacy of the law because it involves the suppression of a source of democratic contestation. The paper distinguishes between three importantly different versions of this legitimacy argument that existing work fails to clearly separate. Doing so is important because different forms of the legitimacy argument are supported by different considerations, vulnerable to different objections, and have different implications. Further, the paper levels two serious objections to legitimacy arguments against hate speech regulation. Firstly, it offers a consolidated defence of an extant rejoinder to the legitimacy argument, based on the claim that some person’s speech can ‘silence’ the expression of others. Secondly, the paper challenges the claim that the regulation of hate speech is necessarily viewpoint discriminatory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/17455243-20203306
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,513
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Authority and Coercion.Arthur Ripstein - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (1):2-35.
Individual Liberty.Hillel Steiner - 1975 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75:33 - 50.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

State Speech Vs. Hate Speech.Michael Weinman - 2006 - Essays in Philosophy 7 (1):83-100.
Differentiating Hate Speech: A Systemic Discrimination Approach.Katharine Gelber - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
What Is the Harm of Hate Speech?Eric Barendt - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):539-553.
Hate Speech, Dignity and Self-Respect.Jonathan Seglow - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5):1103-1116.


Added to PP index

Total views
14 ( #705,694 of 2,446,442 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #231,624 of 2,446,442 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes