There may be strict empirical laws in biology, after all

Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):119-134 (2006)
Abstract
This paper consists of four parts. Part 1 is an introduction. Part 2 evaluates arguments for the claim that there are no strict empirical laws in biology. I argue that there are two types of arguments for this claim and they are as follows: (1) Biological properties are multiply realized and they require complex processes. For this reason, it is almost impossible to formulate strict empirical laws in biology. (2) Generalizations in biology hold contingently but laws go beyond describing contingencies, so there cannot be strict laws in biology. I argue that both types of arguments fail. Part 3 considers some examples of biological laws in recent biological research and argues that they exemplify strict laws in biology. Part 4 considers the objection that the examples in part 3 may be strict laws but they are not distinctively biological laws. I argue that given a plausible account of what distinctively biological means, such laws are distinctively biological.
Keywords Biology  Complexity  Distinctively biological  Multiple realization  Special sciences  Strict laws
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-005-3177-z
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,651
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
The Scientific Image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - Oxford University Press.
Science Without Laws.Ronald N. Giere - 1999 - University of Chicago Press.
Laws and Symmetry.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1989 - Oxford University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Shifting to Structures in Physics and Biology: A Prophylactic for Promiscuous Realism.Steven French - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (2):164-173.
Philosophical Issues in Recent Paleontology.Derek D. Turner - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (7):494-505.
Gould's Replay Revisited.Derek Turner - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):65-79.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
How is Biological Explanation Possible?Alex Rosenberg - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):735-760.
Gould on Laws in Biological Science.Lee Mcintyre - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):357-367.
All Else Being Equal.Peter Lipton - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (2):155-168.
Sober and Elgin on Laws of Biology: A Critique. [REVIEW]Lane DesAutels - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):249-256.
Biology and a Priori Laws.Mehmet Elgin - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1380--1389.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

257 ( #13,104 of 2,169,342 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #82,266 of 2,169,342 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums