Biosemiotics 3 (1):33-55 (2010)

Frederik Stjernfelt
University of Aarhus
Joao Queiroz
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
Mimicry and deception are two important issues in studies about animal communication. The reliability of animal signs and the problem of the benefits of deceiving in sign exchanges are interesting topics in the evolution of communication. In this paper, we intend to contribute to an understanding of deception by studying the case of aggressive signal mimicry in fireflies, investigated by James Lloyd. Firefly femmes fatales are specialized in mimicking the mating signals of other species of fireflies with the purpose of attracting responding males to become their prey. These aggressive mimics are a major factor in the survival and reproduction of both prey and predator. It is a case of deception through active falsification of information that leads to efficient predation by femmes fatales fireflies and triggered evolutionary processes in their preys’ communicative behaviors. There are even nested coevolutionary interactions between these fireflies, leading to a remarkable system of deceptive and counterdeceptive signaling behaviors. We develop here a semiotic model of firefly deception and also consider ideas advanced by Lloyd about the evolution of communication, acknowledging that deception can be part of the explanation of why communication evolves towards increasing complexity. Increasingly complex sign exchanges between fireflies evolve in an extremely slow pace. Even if deceptive maneuvers are played out time and time again between particular firefly individuals, the evolution of the next level of complexity—and thus the next utterance in the dialogue between species—is likely to take an immense amount of generations
Keywords Communication  Deception  Semiotics  Firefly femmes fatales  Evolution
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12304-009-9048-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Linguistic Behaviour.Jonathan Francis Bennett - 1976 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Signaling Without Cooperation.Marc Artiga - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (3):357-378.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self-Deception Vs. Self-Caused Deception: A Comment on Professor Mele.Robert Audi - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):104-104.
Understanding and Explaining Real Self-Deception.Alfred R. Mele - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):127-134.
The Philosophy of Deception.Clancy Martin (ed.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Reviewing the Logic of Self-Deception.Ellen Fridland - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):22-23.
The Uses of Self-Deception.Howard Rachlin & Marvin Frankel - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):124-125.
Self-Deception.Stanley Paluch - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):268-278.
Self-Deception.Alfred R. Mele - 1983 - Philosophical Quarterly 33 (October):366-377.
Reflections on Self-Deception.William von Hippel & Robert Trivers - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):41-56.


Added to PP index

Total views
558 ( #14,960 of 2,498,897 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #8,464 of 2,498,897 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes