Biodiversity as a General, Scientific Concept

Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (1):41-43 (2015)

Christopher H. Eliot
Hofstra University
Morar et al. argue that justifications for conservation based on assessments of biodiversity are vacuous, because ‘biodiversity’ is a flawed concept. However, their analysis of the concept mistakes how scientific concepts function. The concept ‘biodiversity’ stands up to their criticisms
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/21550085.2015.1016961
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,223
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science as Social Knowledge.Sharon L. Crasnow - 1993 - Hypatia 8 (3):194-201.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Save the Planet: Eliminate Biodiversity.Carlos Santana - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (6):761-780.
Protection of Biodiversity for the Sake of Science?Gesine Schepers - 2014 - In Dirk Lanzerath & Minou Friele (eds.), Concepts and Values in Biodiversity. Routledge. pp. 329-348.
What is Biodiversity?James Maclaurin & Kim Sterelny - 2008 - University of Chicago Press.
Through the Jungle of Biological Diversity.Carlo Ricotta - 2005 - Acta Biotheoretica 53 (1):29-38.
Conservation Through Commodification?Jozef Keulartz - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (3):297-307.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #403,067 of 2,285,770 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #197,657 of 2,285,770 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature