Cognitive Science Quarterly 1 (2):147-170 (2000)

Authors
Chris Eliasmith
University of Waterloo
Abstract
It will always remain a remarkable phenomenon in the history of philosophy, that there was a time, when even mathematicians, who at the same time were philosophers, began to doubt, not of the accuracy of their geometrical propositions so far as they concerned space, but of their objective validity and the applicability of this concept itself, and of all its corollaries, to nature. They showed much concern whether a line in nature might not consist of physical points, and consequently that true space in the object might consist of simple [discrete] parts, while the space which the geometer has in his mind [being continuous] cannot be such
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Analog and Digital, Continuous and Discrete.Corey J. Maley - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (1):117-131.
The Tractable Cognition Thesis.Iris Van Rooij - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (6):939-984.
How We Ought to Describe Computation in the Brain.Chris Eliasmith - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):313-320.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
281 ( #38,848 of 2,519,267 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #58,563 of 2,519,267 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes