Journal of Business Ethics 1 (3):167 - 177 (1982)

Abstract
This paper examines the moral arguments for and against employees' blowing the whistle on illegal or immoral actions of their employers. It asks whether such professional dissidents are justified in disclosing wrongdoing by others while concealing their own identity. Part I examines the concept of anonymity, distinguishing it from two similar concepts — secrecy and privacy. Part II analyzes the concept of whistleblowing using recent definitions by Bok, Bowie and De George. Various arguments against anonymous whistleblowing are identified and evaluated. The author concludes with a defense of the practice in terms of social benefits — primarily the redressing of wrongdoing.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00382768
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
555 ( #9,219 of 2,333,950 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #256,311 of 2,333,950 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes