Philosophy of Science 73 (5):790-802 (2006)
The biological effects of low doses of toxic and carcinogenic chemicals are currently a matter of significant scientific controversy. This paper argues that philosophers of science can contribute to alleviating this controversy by examining it with the aid of a novel account of scientific anomaly. Specifically, analysis of contemporary research on chemical hormesis (i.e., alleged beneficial biological effects produced by low doses of substances that are harmful at higher doses) suggests that scientists may initially describe anomalous phenomena in terms of multiple distinct "characterizations," each of which is compatible with current empirical evidence. By focusing attention on this feature of scientific anomalies, philosophers of science can alleviate the controversy over low-dose chemical effects in at least two ways: (1) they can pinpoint the significant ways in which particular characterizations frame the controversy, and (2) they can identify the methodological value judgments at stake in researchers' choice of characterizations.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth.L. Laudan - 1977 - University of California Press.
Thinking About Mechanisms.Peter K. Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge.Deborah G. Mayo - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (1):455-459.
Citations of this work BETA
Philosophical Scrutiny of Evidence of Risks: From Bioethics to Bioevidence.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):803-816.
Non-Cognitive Values and Methodological Learning in the Decision-Oriented Sciences.Oliver Todt & José Luis Luján - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (1):215-234.
Similar books and articles
Using Metascience to Improve Dose‐Response Curves in Biology: Better Policy Through Better Science.Kristin Shrader‐Frechette - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1026-1037.
An Ethics of Expertise Based on Informed Consent.Kevin C. Elliott - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):637-661.
Mice and the Reactor: The "Genetics Experiment" in 1950s Britain.Chadarevian Soraya De - 2006 - Journal of the History of Biology 39 (4):707 - 735.
Using a Thought Experiment to Clarify a Radiobiological Controversy.Kristan Shrader-Frechete - 2001 - Synthese 128 (3):319 - 342.
Biological Effects of Low Level Radiation: Values, Dose-Response Models, Risk Estimates.Helen E. Longino - 1989 - Synthese 81 (3):391 - 404.
Ideological Toxicology: Invalid Logic, Science, Ethics About Low-Dose Pollution.K. Shrader-Frechette - unknown
Conceptual Analysis and Special-Interest Science: Toxicology and the Case of Edward Calabrese.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2010 - Synthese 177 (3):449 - 469.
Radiobiological Hormesis, Methodological Value Judgments, and Metascience.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2000 - Perspectives on Science 8 (4):367-379.
Radiobiogical Hormesis, Methodological Value Judgments, and Metascience.K. S. Shrader-Frechette - 2000 - Perspectives on Science 8 (4):367-379.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #309,002 of 2,153,498 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,963 of 2,153,498 )
How can I increase my downloads?