A Reply to Critics

Historical Materialism 15 (3):143-170 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ellen Wood replies here to the symposium on her book, Empire of Capital, by laying out her views on the specificity of capitalism and capitalist imperialism, the relation between global capital and territorial states, the problematic concepts of 'globalisation' and 'financialisation', and how our understanding of capitalism affects our conceptions of oppositional struggle.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,105

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Critics.Christopher Arthur - 2005 - Historical Materialism 13 (2):189-222.
A reply to critics.Wood Meisksins Ellen - 2007 - Historical Materialism 15 (3).
Reply to Critics.Jeff Speaks - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (2):492-506.
Reply to critics.Matti Eklund - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (5):535-561.
A Reply to Critics.Q. Skinner - 1988 - In James Tully (ed.), Meaning and context: Quentin Skinner and his critics. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press. pp. 233.
Reply to Critics.A. J. Ayer - 1997 - In Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Morality and the good life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reply to Critics.Hans Lindahl - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (2):419-429.
Reply to Critics.Michael C. Rea - 2017 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), Inter-Christian Philosophical Dialogues. London: Routledge.
Reply to Critics.Agustín Rayo - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (4):498-534.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
75 (#270,745)

6 months
20 (#139,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?