Conceptual clarification and policy-related science: The case of chemical hormesis

Perspectives on Science 8 (4):346-366 (2000)

Kevin Elliott
University of Newcastle
: This paper examines the epistemological warrant for a toxicological phenomenon known as chemical hormesis. First, it argues that conceptual confusion contributes significantly to current disagreements about the status of chemical hormesis as a biological hypothesis. Second, it analyzes seven distinct concepts of chemical hormesis, arguing that none are completely satisfactory. Finally, it suggests three ramifications of this analysis for ongoing debates about the epistemological status of chemical hormesis. This serves as a case study supporting the value of philosophical methodologies such as conceptual clarifica-tion for addressing contemporary scientific disputes, including policy-related scientific disputes that may be heavily in(integral)uenced by social and political factors
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/106361400753373731
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,822
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

An Ethics of Expertise Based on Informed Consent.Kevin C. Elliott - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):637-661.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #375,580 of 2,265,046 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #860,568 of 2,265,046 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature