Inquiry 26 (3):359 – 361 (1983)
Don Mannison levels three criticisms at the claims I make in ?Faking Nature?. First, he claims that I argue from (1) X is valued to (2) X has value. I do not. Second, he criticizes an argument of Nelson Goodman's to which I allude. While his criticism has point he misrepresents the role I assign to Goodman's argument. Third, he suggests that there is no need for me to count environmental evaluations as evaluations of the moral kind. However, he offers no account of why I should not and ignores an important consideration that requires that I should
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Making and Finding Values in Nature: From a Humean Point of View.Y. S. Lo - 2006 - Inquiry 49 (2):123 – 147.
On the ‘Emotionality’ of Environmental Restoration: Narratives of Guilt, Restitution, Redemption and Hope.Laura Smith - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (3):286-307.
Similar books and articles
Toward an Ethics of the Domesticated Environment.Roger J. H. King - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):3 – 14.
The Reintroduction and Reinterpretation of the Wild.Eileen O'Rourke - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):144-165.
Fatal Attraction. Wildnes in Contemporary Film.Martin Drenthen - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (3):297-315.
The Place of Domesticated Spaces in Environmental Ethics.Roger J. H. King - 2003 - Social Philosophy Today 19:41-53.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads9 ( #459,921 of 2,164,541 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,971 of 2,164,541 )
How can I increase my downloads?