Murdoch and Levinas on God and Good

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):63 - 87 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Murdoch and Levinas both believe that our humanity requires us to suppress our natural egoism and to be morally responsive to others. Murdoch insists that while such a morality presupposes a ’transcendent background’, God should be kept out of the picture altogether. By contrast, Levinas argues that, in responding morally to others, we make contact with God (though not the God of traditional Christianity) and that in doing so we become more God-like. I attempt to clarify their agreements and differences, and I offer some criticisms of their conception of humanity, God, and the relationship between them

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-27

Downloads
1,403 (#10,365)

6 months
182 (#18,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fiona Ellis
University of Roehampton

Citations of this work

Levinas, Adorno, and the Ethics of the Material Other.Eric Sean Nelson - 2020 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references