Fiona Ellis
University of Roehampton
Murdoch and Levinas both believe that our humanity requires us to suppress our natural egoism and to be morally responsive to others. Murdoch insists that while such a morality presupposes a ’transcendent background’, God should be kept out of the picture altogether. By contrast, Levinas argues that, in responding morally to others, we make contact with God (though not the God of traditional Christianity) and that in doing so we become more God-like. I attempt to clarify their agreements and differences, and I offer some criticisms of their conception of humanity, God, and the relationship between them
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.24204/ejpr.v1i2.341
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Iris Murdoch and the Nature of Good.Elizabeth Burns - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):303-313.
Naming the Unnameable God: Levinas, Derrida, and Marion. [REVIEW]Anselm K. Min - 2006 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60 (1/3):99 - 116.
Conscientious Subjectivity in Kierkegaard and Levinas.Brian T. Prosser - 2002 - Continental Philosophy Review 35 (4):397-422.


Added to PP index

Total views
400 ( #19,019 of 2,420,322 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
71 ( #10,024 of 2,420,322 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes