Philosophy 80 (2):199-217 (2005)
Do minority groups have a right to the preservation of their language? I argue that the rights of groups are always reducible to the rights of individuals. In that case, the question whether minorities have a right to the preservation of their language is a question of whether individuals have a right to it. I argue that, in the only relevant sense of ‘right’, they do not. They may have an interest in the preservation of their language, but, if so, that interest must be weighed against the costs of satisfying it, and, normally at least, we should expect that the costs will be quite out of proportion to the weight of the interests involved.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Neutrality, Liberal Nation Building and Minority Cultural Rights.Zhidas Daskalovski - 2002 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):27-50.
Minority Oppression and Justified Revolution.Chris W. Surprenant - 2010 - Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (4):442-453.
Individuals' Interest in the Preservation of Their Culture.Chaim Gans - 2007 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 1 (1):6-16.
Are Cultural Group Rights Against Individual Rights?Erol Kuyurtar - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:51-59.
Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?Kaija Rossi - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:165-170.
Why Linguistic Territorialism in the UK Does Not Justify Differential Minority Language Rights.Shaun Gates - 2010 - Ethics and Education 5 (1):3-13.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads90 ( #57,852 of 2,172,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,336 of 2,172,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?