Philosophy of Science 31 (4):357-380 (1964)
In the first part of this paper it is shown that unit names, whether simple or complex, whether of fundamental, associative or derivative measurement, may always be regarded as the names of scales. In the second it is shown that dimension names, whether simple, like "[M]", "[L]" and "[T]", or complex dimensional formulae, may always be regarded as the names of classes of similar scales. Thus, a new foundation for the theory of dimensional analysis is provided, and in the light of this, its nature and scope are examined. Dimensional analysis is shown to depend upon certain conventions for expressing numerical laws
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Denoting Concepts, Reference, and the Logic of Names, Classes as Many, Groups, and Plurals.Nino Cocchiarella - 2005 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (2):135 - 179.
Proper Names and Their Fictional Uses.Heidi Tiedke - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):707 - 726.
Derived Measurement, Dimensions, and Dimensional Analysis.Robert L. Causey - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (3):252-270.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #417,055 of 2,143,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,161 of 2,143,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.