Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):297-300 (2002)
Should doctors have the possibility to save children from incurable suffering and end their lives?. At first glance, the standpoints in the debate around this question seem translucent and well known and the debate intelligible. I contend that this is not the case and I will illustrate this in analysing the debate between Peter Singer and Ulrich Bleidick. Whomever wants to answer the question whether it is acceptable to end the lives of suffering small children will have to do some careful reading and thinking about the different and differing moral arguments in the debate. This demands emotional restraint and intellectual honesty. Trying to understand Singer and his opponents is a challenging way of charting what exactly is at stake in this debate
|Keywords||children disability end of life mental impairment replaceability of children|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Children and the Argument From 'Marginal' Cases.Amy Mullin - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):291-305.
Utilitarian Practical Ethics: Sidgwick and Singer.Anthony Skelton - 2011 - In Placido Bucolo, Roger Crisp & Bart Schultz (eds.), Henry Sidgwick: Ethics, Psychics, and Politics. Catania: University of Catania Press.
Singer, Moore, and the Metaphysics of Morals.Jack Temkin - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:567-571.
Bar-Coded Children: An Exploration of Issues Around the Inclusion of Children on the England and Wales National DNA Database.M. Levitt & F. Tomasini - unknown
Review of Peter Singer, The Life You Can Save. [REVIEW]Anthony Skelton - 2009 - The Globe and Mail: F11.
Ethics, Sexual Orientation, and Choices About Children.Timothy F. Murphy - 2012 - The MIT Press.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads9 ( #458,311 of 2,158,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #353,777 of 2,158,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?