Scaling up; scaling down: What’s missing?

Synthese 198 (4):2849-2863 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What are we trying to explain when we explain behavior? How is behavior conceptualized as an object of study and how else might it be conceptualized? Longino urges pluralism with respect to causes and explanations of behavior. This paper extends Longino’s analysis to the object of those explanations and urges pluralism with respect to behavior itself. The paper proposes that there are three ways in which behavior can be conceptualized, each of which opens to different kinds of research questions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Asking Questions About Behavior.James W. Mc Kearney - 1977 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 21 (1):109-119.
A Behavioral Interpretation of Psychophysical Scaling.G. E. Zuriff - 1972 - Behavior and Philosophy 1 (1):118.
Chaos and Related Things: A Tutorial.Bruce J. West - 1997 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 18 (2-3):103-126.
Theoretical Pluralism and the Scientific Study of Behavior.Helen Longino - 2006 - In Stephen Kellert, Helen Longino & C. Kenneth Waters (eds.), Scientific Pluralism. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 102-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-30

Downloads
43 (#269,345)

6 months
1 (#417,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Longino
Stanford University