Is Profound Boredom Boredom?

In Christos Hadjioannou (ed.), Heidegger on Affect. Palgrave (2019)

Authors
Lauren Freeman
University of Louisville
Andreas Elpidorou
University of Louisville
Abstract
Martin Heidegger is often credited as having offered one of the most thorough phenomenological investigations of the nature of boredom. In his 1929–1930 lecture course, The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, he goes to great lengths to distinguish between three different types of boredom and to explicate their respective characters. Within the context of his discussion of one of these types of boredom, profound boredom [tiefe Langweile], Heidegger opposes much of the philosophical and literary tradition on boredom insofar as he articulates how the experience of boredom can be existentially beneficial to us. In this chapter, we undertake a study of the nature of profound boredom with the aim of investigating its place within contemporary psychological and philosophical research on boredom. Although boredom used to be a neglected emotional experience, it is no more. Boredom’s causal antecedents, effects, experiential profile, and neurophysiological correlates have become topics of active study; as a consequence, a proliferation of claims and findings about boredom has ensued. Such a situation provides an opportunity to scrutinize Heidegger’s claims and to try to understand them both on their own terms and in light of our contemporary understanding of boredom.
Keywords boredom  mood  emotion  psychology  phenomenology  Heidegger
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Living with Boredom.Cheshire Calhoun - 2011 - Sophia 50 (2):269-279.
The Good of Boredom.Andreas Elpidorou - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):323-351.
The Bored Mind is a Guiding Mind: Toward a Regulatory Theory of Boredom.Andreas Elpidorou - 2018 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17 (3):455-484.
Immortality and Boredom.John Martin Fischer & Benjamin Mitchell-Yellin - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (4):353-372.
Boredom with Husserl and Beyond.Janko Lozar - 2014 - Prolegomena 13 (1):107-121.
Boredom.W. O'Brien - 2014 - Analysis 74 (2):236-244.
Boredom.Wendell O'Brien - 2018 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Philosophy of Boredom.Lars Svendsen - 2005 - Reaktion Books.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-07

Total views
37 ( #219,051 of 2,250,031 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #19,620 of 2,250,031 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature