Han Feizi's Thought and Republicanism

Feizi’s philosophy is usually represented as an amoral autocracy where the ruler is the sole political power and runs the state by controlling the people through rewards and punishments. While his system is formally autocratic, this article argues that the purpose behind this system bears some similarity to the republican political ideal of non-domination. In this interpretation, Han Feizi makes the ruler the sole power to mitigate the danger of the state being dominated by ministers. He does not employ republican institutions, but attempts to discourage the ruler from using his power capriciously in order to increase order and security in the state, which are his ultimate political values. Han Feizi is not a republican, but this similarity suggests that when revised for today’s very different circumstances, Han Feizian philosophy’s focus on impartial law can make a contribution to contemporary Chinese political thought
Keywords Han Feizi  Republicanism  Political philosophy  Law
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11712-011-9220-7
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Liberty before Liberalism.Quentin Skinner - 2001 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 63 (1):172-175.
The World of Thought in Ancient China.Benjamin I. Schwartz - 1985 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Democracy and Meritocracy: Toward a Confucian Perspective.Joseph Chan - 2007 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (2):179–193.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Internal Morality of Chinese Legalism.Kenneth Winston - 2005 - Singapore Journal of Legal Studies:313-347.
Han Feizi's Legalism Versus Kautilya's Arthashastra.Roger Boesche - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):157 – 172.
Han Fei's Doctrine of Self-Interest.Paul R. Goldin - 2001 - Asian Philosophy 11 (3):151 – 159.
Xunzi and Han Fei on Human Nature.Alejandro Bárcenas - 2012 - International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2):135-148.
Shen Dao's Own Voice in the Shenzi Fragments.Soon-Ja Yang - 2011 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):187-207.
Fa (Standards: Laws) and Meaning Changes in Chinese Philosophy.Chad Hansen - 1994 - Philosophy East and West 44 (3):435-488.
Machiavelli and Republicanism.Gisela Bock, Quentin Skinner & Maurizio Viroli (eds.) - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
55 ( #106,363 of 2,225,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #39,243 of 2,225,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature