Counterfactuals without Possible Worlds? A Difficulty for Fine’s Exact Semantics for Counterfactuals

Journal of Philosophy (5):276-287 (2014)
Authors
Brian Embry
University of Groningen
Abstract
In this paper I argue that there is a difficulty for Fine's exact semantics for counterfactuals. The difficulty undermines Fine's reasons for preferring exact semantics to possible worlds semantics.
Keywords Counterfactuals  Possible Worlds  Semantics  Truthmaker
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/jphil2014111522
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-07-21

Total downloads
663 ( #3,061 of 2,268,444 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
93 ( #3,289 of 2,268,444 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature