AI and Society 8 (3):298-303 (1994)
Conclusions As my paper draws to a close, it may seem quite clear that by posing such questions about the organisation of work and labour, one opens up more problems than are actually solved. There is one question in particular that has to be answered. I shall ask that question rhetorically: Can there be a world in which group activities are not started up?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Group Intentions as Equilibria.Sara Rachel Chant & Zachary Ernst - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):95 - 109.
Minding One's Cognitive Systems: When Does a Group of Minds Constitute a Single Cognitive Unit?Robert D. Rupert - 2005 - Episteme 1 (3):177-188.
The Pan-European Approach in the Fight Against Corruption: The Council of Europe.Raael A. Benitez - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):269-280.
Self Experiences in Group, Revisited: Affective Attachments, Intersubjective Regulations, and Human Understanding.Irene N. H. Harwood, Walter Stone & Malcolm Pines (eds.) - 2012 - Routledge.
Creativity, Group Pedagogy and Social Action: A Departure From Gough.James Evans, Ian Cook & Helen Griffiths - 2008 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (2):330–345.
The Work Ethic Values of Protestant British, Catholic Irish and Muslim Turkish Managers.M. Arslan - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (4):321 - 339.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads13 ( #353,309 of 2,168,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,519 of 2,168,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?