Beyond the Equivalence Thesis: how to think about the ethics of withdrawing and withholding life-saving medical treatment

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (1):21-41 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With few exceptions, the literature on withdrawing and withholding life-saving treatment considers the bare fact of withdrawing or withholding to lack any ethical significance. If anything, the professional guidelines on this matter are even more uniform. However, while no small degree of progress has been made toward persuading healthcare professionals to withhold treatments that are unlikely to provide significant benefit, it is clear that a certain level of ambivalence remains with regard to withdrawing treatment. Given that the absence of clinical benefit means treating patients is not only ethically questionable but also taxing on resources that could meet the needs of others, this ambivalence is troubling. Equally, the enduring ambivalence of professionals might be taken to indicate that the issue warrants further attention. In this paper, we review the academic literature on the ethical equivalence of withdrawing and withholding medical treatment. While we are not in outright disagreement with the arguments presented, we suggest that asserting theoretical and decontextualized claims about the ethical equivalence of withdrawing and withholding life-saving treatment does not fully illuminate the moral questions associated with the relevant clinical realities. We argue that what is required is a broader perspective, one rooted in an understanding that withdrawing and withholding life-saving treatment are different practices, the meanings of which are fully comprehensible only through an appreciation of their place within the practice of healthcare more generally. Such an account suggests that if one is to engage with the inappropriate protraction of life-saving treatment resulting from healthcare professionals’ disinclination to withdraw it, then the differences between these practices should be taken seriously.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Ethics of Withholding and Withdrawing Unwarranted Diagnoses.Bjørn Morten Hofmann & Marianne Lea - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (3):425-433.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-13

Downloads
30 (#550,560)

6 months
8 (#415,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nathan Emmerich
Queen's University, Belfast (PhD)
Bert Gordijn
Dublin City University

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
After virtue: a study in moral theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1981 - Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
The birth of bioethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 51 references / Add more references