Research Ethics 12 (4):234-243 (2016)

Nathan Emmerich
Australian National University
This essay responds to an article, ‘Variation in university research ethics review’, published in this issue. It argues that the authors of that paper do not fully distinguish the usual function of university research ethics committees from that of a gatekeeper. The latter term more accurately describes the task they happen to have asked them to fulfil in the course of conducting some empirical research. Whilst they are not alone in making it, the result of this conflation is that the reflections they offer are misguided. In this short comment I briefly discuss the distinction between a REC and a gatekeeper, and indicate how it impacts on the proposals sketched by Vadeboncoeur et al.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1747016116651668
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Before the Law.Mark Eli Kalderon - 2011 - Philosophical Issues 21 (1):219-244.
The State as Gatekeeper: A Reply.Robyn Eckersley - 2006 - Politics and Ethics Review 2 (2):127-138.
The Gatekeeper.Mamadi Corra & David Willer - 2002 - Sociological Theory 20 (2):180-207.
Balancing Rationalities: Gatekeeping in Health Care.D. L. Willems - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (1):25-29.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #788,440 of 2,454,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes