Herbert Hart and the Semantic Sting

Legal Theory 4 (3):283-300 (1998)
Abstract
Even to disagree, we need to understand each other. If I reject what you say without understanding you, we will only have the illusion of a disagreement. You will be asserting one thing and I will be denying another. Even to disagree, we need some agreement
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1352325200001038
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,308
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Concept of Law.H. L. A. Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart's ‘Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence’.Philip Schofield - 2010 - Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 1 (2):147-167.
Hart, Legal Rules and Palm Tree Justice.Wilfrid J. Waluchow - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (1):41 - 70.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited.F. Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory.Neil MacCormick - 1978 - Oxford University Press.
Reply: The Nature and Virtue of Law.N. E. Simmonds - 2010 - Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 1 (2):277-293.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
61 ( #87,525 of 2,180,132 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #304,923 of 2,180,132 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums