Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):101-122 (1996)

I focus on and criticize John Searle's argument against a classical computational view of the mind according to which the attribution of syntax is observer relative (in Searle, Rediscovery of Mind, MIT Press, 1992). Searle's argument is interesting inasmuch as it differs from his previous and more well-known argument that syntax is not sufficient for semantics. This argument aims to undercut even the syntax as something that exists only in the eye of the beholder. I show that Searle's argument rests on premises that go unsupported.
Keywords Machine Functionalism  Symbol Systems
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI cjphil19962615
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Minds, Brains, and Programs.John R. Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.
The Rediscovery of the Mind.John R. Searle - 1992 - Philosophy 68 (265):415-418.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Searle, Syntax, and Observer Relativity.Ronald P. Endicott - 1996 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):101-22.
The Chinese Rune Argument–Searle's Response.John Searle - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):75-77.
Is the Brain a Digital Computer?John R. Searle - 1990 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 64 (3):21-37.
Syntax, Semantics, Physics.John Haugeland - 2003 - In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
The Chinese Rune Argument.Barry Smith - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):66-74.
Searle's Experiments with Thought.William J. Rapaport - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (June):271-9.
Searle, Programs and Functionalism.Richard Double - 1983 - Nature and System 5 (March-June):107-14.
Cognitivism and Explanatory Relativity.Jeffrey Hershfield - 1998 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):505-526.
Is Physics an Observer-Private Phenomenon Like Consciousness?Otto E. Rossler - 1998 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (4):443-453.
What is Context For? Syntax in a Non-Abstract World.Tom Sgouros - 2005 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (2):235-251.


Added to PP index

Total views
83 ( #114,310 of 2,348,170 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #17,594 of 2,348,170 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes