Realism, empiricism and scientific revolutions

Philosophy of Science 58 (3):468-485 (1991)
The logical empiricists knew that scientific theories sometimes arise out of the attempt to reconcile or unify two existing theories. They also thought that, at best, old theories would be retained as approximations to their successors. Kuhn lost both insights when he rejected the logical empiricists' formal approach in favor of an exclusively historical and psychological one. But when Putnam tried to restore such ideas he failed to provide them with the historical support they require. An account of revolutionary unifications is defended as reconciling Putnam's realist ideas about methodology with Kuhn's historical approach
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289629
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,871
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
39 ( #150,935 of 2,231,946 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #265,297 of 2,231,946 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature