Grazer Philosophische Studien 40 (1):113-130 (1991)
AbstractThe relationship between inconsistency and Lehrerian coherence is scrutinized. Like most coherence theorists of epistemic justification, Lehrer contends that consistency is necessary for coherence. Despite this contention, minimally inconsistent belief-sets prove coherent and rationally acceptable on Lehrer's account of coherence. Lehrer is left with the following dilemma: If consistency is necessary for coherence, then (i) he must revise his account of coherence accordingly and, more importantly, (ii) such coherence is nof necessary for justification, since intuitively we are justified in accepting such minimally inconsistent belief-sets. If, on the other hand, minimally inconsistent acceptance systems can be coherent, then to prevent pairwise inconsistent statements form readily cohering with such systems, Lehrer must deny that rational acceptance is closed under deduction.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Coherence Theory of Knowledge: A Gradational Account. [REVIEW]Elke Brendel - 1999 - Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):293-307.
Probability, Evidence, and the Coherence of the Whole Truth.Charles B. Cross - 1995 - Synthese 103 (2):153 - 170.
Unreckoned Misleading Truths and Lehrer’s Theory of Undefeated Justification.John W. Bender - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:465-481.
Epistemic Coherence.Paul Thagard, Chris Eliasmith, Paul Rusnock & Cameron Shelley - 2002 - In R. Elio (ed.), Common sense, reasoning, and rationality. Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science (Vol. 11). Oxford University Press. pp. 104-131.
Measuring Coherence Using LP-Models.Carlos A. OLLER - 2004 - Journal of Applied Logic 2 (4):451-455.
Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification.Erik J. Olsson - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Relevant Deduction and Minimally Inconsistent Sets.Keith Lehrer - 1973 - Philosophia 3 (2-3):153-165.
Ways in Which Coherence is Confirmation Conducive.Luca Moretti - 2007 - Synthese 157 (3):309 - 319.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Competing for Acceptance Lehrer's Rule and the Paradoxes of Justification.Erik J. Olsson - 1998 - Theoria 64 (1):34-54.