Mind 80 (320):608-611 (1971)

I argue here that recent discussions of f. sommers' "rule for enforcing ambiguity" have been mistaken on one of two grounds. either they misrepresent the sense of the rule or they misunderstand its intent. the rule is neither a sense rule nor a categorial rule, but a 'translation' rule relating senses of terms to categories of individuals. rather than a test for term ambiguity the rule is a test for theory coherence. finally, i show that there are many possible ways of applying the rule
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/LXXX.320.608
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sommers' Theory and the Paradox of Confirmation.George Englebretsen - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (3):438-441.
A Modification of Sommers' Rule.R. Straaten - 1971 - Philosophical Studies 22 (1-2):16 - 20.
Brody on Sommers.George Englebretsen - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 26 (2):149 - 150.
Sommers on the Predicate 'Exists'.George Englebretsen - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 26 (5-6):419 - 423.
Elgood on Sommers's Rules of Sense.George Englebretsen - 1971 - Philosophical Quarterly 21 (82):71-73.
On Van Straaten's Modification of Sommers' Rule.George Englebretsen - 1972 - Philosophical Studies 23 (3):216 - 219.


Added to PP index

Total views
41 ( #267,170 of 2,463,155 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #144,429 of 2,463,155 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes