Simple Collective Identity Functions
Theory and Decision 68 (4):417-443 (2010)
Abstract
A Collective Identity Function (CIF) is a rule which aggregates personal opinions on whether an individual belongs to a certain identity into a social decision. A simple CIF is one which can be expressed in terms of winning coalitions. We characterize simple CIFs and explore various CIFs of the literature by exploiting their ability of being expressed in terms of winning coalitions. We also use our setting to introduce conditions that ensure the equal treatment of individuals as voters or as outcomesDOI
10.1007/s11238-008-9098-y
My notes
Similar books and articles
Liberal recognition for identity? Only for particularized ones.Sahar Akhtar - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):66-87.
Judgement Aggregation and Distributed Thinking.Kai Spiekermann - 2010 - AI and Society 25 (4):401-412.
Collective Identity and Collective Memory in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur.David J. Leichter - 2012 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 3 (1):114-131.
Feminist praxis challenges the identity question: Toward new collective identity metaphors.María Martínez González - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 22-38.
Decision framing in judgment aggregation.Fabrizio Cariani, Marc Pauly & Josh Snyder - 2008 - Synthese 163 (1):1 - 24.
Judgment aggregation without full rationality.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2008 - Social Choice and Welfare 31:15-39.
In Search of the Simple View.Eric T. Olson - forthcoming - In G. Gasser & M. Stefan (eds.), Personal Identity: Complex or Simple? Cambridge University Press.
L'enseignement de l'histoire au secondaire : de la certitude du récit sur la nation au vertige de la modernité.Louis LeVasseur & Jean-François Cardin - 2013 - Revue Phronesis 2 (2):63-76.
Liability and collective identity: A response to Walzer.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (1):13-17.
Sharing without knowing: Collective identity in feminist and democratic theory.Michaele L. Ferguson - 2007 - Hypatia 22 (4):30-45.
Ohno's hypothesis and Muller's paradox: Sex chromosome dosage compensation may serve collective gene functions.Donald R. Forsdyke - 2012 - Bioessays 34 (11):930-933.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-01
Downloads
50 (#237,153)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2013-12-01
Downloads
50 (#237,153)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Independent collective identity functions as voting rules.José Carlos R. Alcantud & Annick Laruelle - 2020 - Theory and Decision 89 (1):107-119.
The possibility of Arrovian social choice with the process of nomination.Yukinori Iwata - 2016 - Theory and Decision 81 (4):535-552.
References found in this work
Simple Games: Desirability Relations, Trading, Pseudoweightings.Alan D. Taylor, William S. Zwicker & William Zwicker - 1999 - Princeton University Press.
On the axiomatic characterization of'Who is a J'.D. A. Dimitrov & S. C. Sung - 2005 - Logique Et Analyse 48 (189-192):101-112.
