The ordination of bioethicists as secular moral experts

Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):59-82 (2002)
The philosophy of medicine cum bioethics has become the socially recognized source for moral and epistemic direction in health-care decision-making. Over the last three decades, this field has been accepted politically as an authorized source of guidance for policy and law. The field's political actors have included the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research , the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, and the new Council on Bioethics; these groups and agencies have set forth rules on issues ranging from the role of humans in biomedical research to the production of human embryos for research, the definition of death, and the permissibility of human cloning. The members of the field are not just scholars and teachers in an academic realm directed to both theoretical and applied issues. They are, in addition, practitioners of a conceptual and moral trade that possesses a legal and political standing. This essay critically addresses the sudden emergence of bioethics as a societally recognized source of moral guidance, a source replete with authorized moral experts. Attention is directed to moral and conceptual assumptions that have led the philosophy of medicine, and especially bioethics, to acquire a quasi-juridical/political role in guiding clinical choices, framing health-care policy, and directing court holdings
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S026505250219203X
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Three Ways to Politicize Bioethics.Mark B. Brown - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):43 – 54.
Motion(Less) in Limine.Giles Scofield - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33 (4):821-833.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Foundations of Bioethics: Contingency and Relevance.Mark P. Aulisio - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (4):428 – 438.
Are Moral Philosophers Moral Experts?Bernward Gesang - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (4):153-159.
Talking Ethics with Strangers: A View From Jewish Tradition.Louis E. Newman - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (6):549-567.
Will the "Secular Priests" of Bioethics Work Among the Sinners?Chris MacDonald - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):36-39.
Dialogue in the Degenerate Case?Patrick G. T. Healey - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-201.
Who Needs Bioethicists?Hallvard Lillehammer - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (1):131-144.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

28 ( #179,220 of 2,153,859 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #398,005 of 2,153,859 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums