Does legal epistemology rest on a mistake? On fetishism, two‐tier system design, and conscientious fact‐finding

Philosophical Issues 31 (1):85-103 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophical Issues, Volume 31, Issue 1, Page 85-103, October 2021.

Similar books and articles

Justification, excuse, and proof beyond reasonable doubt.Hock Lai Ho - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):146-166.
Grounding legal proof.Michael S. Pardo - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):280-298.
Norms of criminal conviction.Jennifer Lackey - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):188-209.
Standards and values.Matthew Kotzen - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):167-187.
Epistemic ambivalence in law.Amalia Amaya - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):7-23.
The state's right to evidence and duties of citizenship.Youngjae Lee - 2021 - Philosophical Issues 31 (1):210-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-17

Downloads
875 (#18,463)

6 months
206 (#16,665)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Levi Spectre
Open University of Israel

Citations of this work

Criminal Proof: Fixed or Flexible?Lewis Ross - 2023 - Philosophical Quarterly (4):1-23.
Knowledge, Individualised Evidence and Luck.Dario Mortini - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (12):3791-3815.
The Foundations of Criminal Law Epistemology.Lewis Ross - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9.
The sensitivity of legal proof.Guido Melchior - 2024 - Synthese 203 (5):1-23.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.
Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.

View all 38 references / Add more references