Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge

Philosophy and Public Affairs 40 (3):197-224 (2012)
Abstract
The law views with suspicion statistical evidence, even evidence that is probabilistically on a par with direct, individual evidence that the law is in no way suspicious of. But it has proved remarkably hard to either justify this suspicion, or to debunk it. In this paper, we connect the discussion of statistical evidence to broader epistemological discussions of similar phenomena. We highlight Sensitivity – the requirement that a belief be counterfactually sensitive to the truth in a specific way – as a way of epistemically explaining the legal suspicion towards statistical evidence. Still, we do not think of this as a satisfactory vindication of the reluctance to rely on statistical evidence. Knowledge – and Sensitivity, and indeed epistemology in general – are of little, if any, legal value. Instead, we tell an incentive-based story vindicating the suspicion towards statistical evidence. We conclude by showing that the epistemological story and the incentive-based story are closely and interestingly related, and by offering initial thoughts about the role of statistical evidence in morality.
Keywords Statistical Evidence  Sensitivity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
DOI 10.1111/papa.12000
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
What Else Justification Could Be.Martin Smith - 2010 - Noûs 44 (1):10 - 31.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Belief, Credence, and Norms.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):1-27.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kierkegaard's Interpretation of His 'Authorship': Some Statistical Evidence.Alastair McKinnon - 1984 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):225 – 233.
Everett and Evidence.Hilary Greaves & Wayne C. Myrvold - 2010 - In Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent & David Wallace (eds.), Many Worlds?: Everett, Quantum Theory & Reality. Oxford University Press.
Objective Evidence and Absence: Comment on Sober.Michael Strevens - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (1):91 - 100.
Strategies for Securing Evidence Through Model Criticism.Kent W. Staley - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):21-43.
Added to PP index
2012-10-16

Total downloads
213 ( #21,514 of 2,225,225 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #4,990 of 2,225,225 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature